Write us!


What would you like to see on The Blaaag? Tell us at theblaaag@gmail.com.

Dear members of the Asian American Alliance community,

After four years on AAA, I find myself enduring the symptoms of withdrawal. Cursing out the multitude of Physical Chemistry textbooks and readings of Kant, I looked forward to every Tuesday night at 8PM where AAA board meetings would take place on the 5th floor of Lerner. There, things would happen.

AAA isn't just a student organization. It's a movement. It's a round table of ideas brought forth by passionate individuals and it's a soundbox for those with a purpose. It's a forum for compromise among the plethora of diverse opinions and it's a playground of exciting and creative student programming. And you all have become a part of it.

I can always include a list of our accomplishments this year (which I shamelessly already have done above), but we're more than that. AAA could not have been without your support, and I'm thankful for each and every one of you for believing in what we do.

This year AAA attempted to bridge the existing divide among Asian Americans and attempted to communicate with the communities beyond our own. It attempted to bring forth a variety of programming that catered to all our members interested in the various aspects of Asian Americana -- including large scale entertainment, social networking, political issues, community service, or all the above.

We succeeded, we failed, but we learned so much. I part with Columbia knowing all too well that AAA has been left in capable hands, continuing the tradition of continuously setting forth loftier goals than their predecessors' and accomplishing them with dedicated and earnest determination.

This symphony of my discontent rests in my all too short time here at Columbia and that I can no longer sit in front row watching AAA grow next year. My only quantum of solace is knowing how much it already has grown because of you. And for that, I'm forever grateful.

This is Calvin, signing off. Thanks for making these goodbyes so awfully difficult.

Of all the people to make playful mockeries of our former Chair, David and I are perhaps best at it. Thanks for sticking with AAA ("those crazy 'white washed' Asians") for four years. We'll remember you for the rest of our time here on campus.

Check this out - Albert Lim from Fallout Central interviews such greats as Bobby Lee, Kaba Modern, Apl.de.ap (Black Eyed Peas), Jabbawockeez, Eric Hsu (Johnny Hi-Fi) and Jade Kira, Russell Peters, Quentin Tarantino, Jack Yang (Cashmere Mafia), and Ron Jeremy. Why Tarantino and Jeremy were there is open to conjecture, but we're glad our friend Albert Lim got to interview these amazing people. He even got Jack Yang to tell us his own secret for his hair.

Love is Growth / Butter&Gun$ EP

From New York City to the Pacific Northwest, Asian American music stretches from the cozy Sunday night spaces of NYC's SULU Series to crowds of thousands at Seattle's annual Bumbershoot music festival. Two new releases-- Taiyo Na's Love is Growth and Blue Scholars' digital EP Butter&Gun$--speak to the newly recognized and on-the-rise talent that should definitely occupy our earspace. I've had the opportunity to meet (on multiple occasions) both Taiyo and the Scholars, and their musical work speaks to the insight and intelligence they possess as socially conscious artists.

Love is Growth

Taiyo Na (birth name: Taiyo Ebato), 25, is the curator of the aforementioned SULU Series (a monthly showcase of Asian American talent at the Bowery Poetry Club), combines hip-hop and folk/acoustic/soul in his debut release. His voice reminds me of Korean Am rapper/poet Denizen Kane's--raspy, somewhere between rap and song, weaving through poetry and music. Through his lyrics he articulates life on the grind, the push forward, the growth in love:

Pain is my dealer who break me with the language
Bless me with the insight to illuminate my canvass
My hurt got a honey, so you can comprehend this
Rock it like a rosary and walk with the anguish...








Taiyo Na - Love is Growth

Heavy on acoustic guitar and strings, the album features the creative input of an arsenal of East Coast Asian American artists--among them, Koba, Vudoo Soul, Craig Chin, Kevin So, and, my personal fave, Emily Chang (formerly of I Was Born With Two Tongues) lending her addictive voice on "Moonlight City (Reprise)." Other highlights include "Kasama," an ode to a sister in the struggle; "Lil' Tookie," in remembrance of Stanley "Tookie" Williams, the Crip-turned-peace activist sentenced to death by the state of California; and "Immigrant Mother (Lovely to Me)," Taiyo's ode to his, believe it or not, immigrant mother.

However, I definitely enjoyed the first two-thirds of the album the most; the last few songs, where Taiyo dips more into the acoustic-folk part of his repertoire, begin to blend together and lose the distinctiveness of the rest of the LP. Other than that, though,
Love is Growth is a solid debut from an artist with much in store for the future.

Butter&Gun$

Blue Scholars, the Seattle, WA hip-hop duo of emcee Geologic (George Quibuyen) and deejay/producer Sabzi (Saba Mohajerjasbi), has recently gained national prominence through their distribution partnership with legendary label Rawkus Records and their 2007 sophomore album, Bayani. Since then, they've released two digital-only EPs, the first revolving around "Joe Metro," Bayani's closing track and Geo's ethnographic narration of riding the Seattle buses. (See my post on the somewhat surprising ballad, "Southbound.") Butter&Gun$--referring to an economic model that weighs a government's spending on military versus social service--operates more as a single for "Loyalty," a sonic ode to the group's followers and, in my opinion, the best track hands down off of Bayani.

Aside from the original version of the song, the EP features a reconceptualization of the theme, chopping-and-screwing segments of the original (I'm kinda ambivalent about that) amidst Geo's unusually rapid-fire delivery:

They put us in competition to cause affliction with opposition
The friction is part of their fiction, they’re looking for pots to piss in
Watch the bosses up in the loft laughing, upping the cost of living
To cop a billion while the cops are killing ‘em off, women and children
Politicians who mock religion and talk tradition to all, just wishing
That all the listeners fall victim, the pistols are drawn, the sinister laws
Is killing the cause, the citizens march, the sinners will start repentance
The minister calls deliverance, guerillas defending their villages...









Blue Scholars - Butter&Gun$ (Loyalty Pt. II)

The other original song, "27," recalls Geo's childhood as a military brat, developing a penchant for hip-hop in Honolulu. As always, Sabzi laces the beats with an eclectic mix of jazz, soul, and funk as Geo paints personal experience and popular struggle in the same breath. Butter&Gun$ is best described as a continuation of Bayani-- a fitting showcase of their talent, yet built upon the same formula that most of their recent songs follow. Nevertheless, Blue Scholars has been getting lots of attention in recent years and I'm excited to see where they'll take their music.

So a number of AAA members have been circulating a Facebook note written by a CC senior who attended CUCSSA's screening of Finding Li Wei and found some of the film's comments blatantly racist. Here is that note:

To the Members of the Columbia University Chinese Scholars and Students Association (CUCSSA), and to those it may concern:

I am writing this note in response to the performance of "寻找李伟 (Finding Li Wei),” a Chinese drama (spoken in Mandarin) performed on the night of Saturday, April 26th, 2008 at Teacher's College, Columbia University. This was one of the most hurtful and disappointing experiences for me during my time here at Columbia University in the City of New York. I was so devastated to hear the racism and the racist slurs against Black people in the show itself. Specifically, there was a racist comment made by one of the characters in the show and it was targeted towards Blacks in Harlem. I went home crying after hearing one of the characters saying, "I feel like Americans are quite nice, but actually no! We need to get rid of those Black people in Harlem. I'm terrified by Black people!" which was followed by an uproar of laughter in the audience. Not only did the character's words hurt me, but so too did the outburst of laughter by nearly 99% of the people in the audience, who are Chinese students at Columbia University.

I am deeply upset and saddened that Columbia Chinese Scholars and Students Association would be associated with and originally produce and write something so racist, especially at a time when the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, an event that people from all across the globe and people of all races will be traveling to China to see. As a black Columbia student and East Asian Studies major, I have dedicated so much of my energy to learning about Chinese language and culture, and even spent quite some time in China for study abroad. I am so saddened that this act of racism occurred on my campus and in such a public, blatant manner, in a play that was written and produced by the Columbia University Chinese Scholars and Students Association (CUCSSA). In recent weeks, I too have been coping with the loss of fellow student, Minghui Yu of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, who was also an active member of the CUCSSA. Although I realize that the physical harassment and death he endured on April 4th, 2008 was at the hands of a West Harlem youth, the ethnic background of his assailant is not a justification for a generic attack on the entire African Diasporic community in Harlem.

Prior to the beginning of the show, I was so excited to attend and invited five of my friends to attend this event. I was so excited to be there. Not only that, but I also cancelled an event last night that I am group organizer and creator of, called the Columbia University Chinese Karaoke Group, since the event conflicted with yesterday's performance of "Finding Li Wei." To make a long story short, I sacrificed my own event to attend this one. In hindsight, I would have rather gone to karaoke.

This incident of racism insulted me and the entire African-American community at my own university and in front of my own eyes! This prejudice will not be tolerated. The fact that these racist comments were spoken in Chinese does NOT desensitize the issue. To my fellow audience members: I left crying while all of you kept laughing and snickering. I am so saddened that "Chinese scholars" would write a screenplay that would instigate racism in our Columbia community. I am also especially disappointed, hurt and overwhelmed by the fact that a "friend" of mine, Guo Rui SEAS '08 was the playwright.

Columbia University is one of the most prestigious universities in the world, and it really needs to enforce its supposed intolerance of racist acts on campus. Within the past year alone, there have been many hate crimes on Columbia's campus, with only a few gaining attention by the administration. I am so saddened that yet another one occurred. Members of the CUCSSA, please remember that there are fellow students of the African Diaspora and from Harlem who attend the SAME university as you. Show respect, and STOP THE RACISM!!!!!!!
Sadly, no AAA members were in attendance; but anybody who was there is welcome to comment.

Update: In hindsight, it's a shame that the Minghui Yu / Bwog discussion didn't take off, because this issue definitely could have been worked into it.

Copied & pasted from the AAA website:

After a 2 hour election deliberation marked by tears and laughter, I would like to congratulate the new AAA board of 2008-2009:

Chair - Aretha Choi (BC 2010)

CC/SEAS Vice Chair - Shilpa Vadodaria (SEAS 2010)

BC Vice Chair - Katie Wang (BC 2010)

Secretary - Daniel Nisball (SEAS 2009)

Treasurer - Jeremy Tapp (CC 2011)

Political Chair - Jia Ahmad (CC 2011)

Community Chairs - Lena Fan (CC 2010) & Mei Li Zhou (BC 2011)

Social Chair - Patrick Chang (SEAS 2011)

Publicity Chair - Corinne Fukayama (SEAS 2010)

Historians - Eddie Kang (CC 2011) & Lizzie Shen (CC 2011)

USCC Representative - Evan Omi (CC 2011)

You all have my love. Stay classy.

- Calvin, former Chair

Stay classy... San Diego?

This concludes Calvin's Harold & Kumar 2 interview series. Enjoy!

Jon Hurwitz & Hayden Schlossberg, writers and directors of Harold & Kumar 1 & 2


Will you do a Harold & Kumar 3?

JH & HS: Yes we would do a third film if given the chance. The DVDs are the main source of income for films. What we’ve heard is that our DVDs have sold at a level the same as bigger movies. 30 million in sales I think.

I have a copy of Entertainment Weekly that says it right here: 80 million

JH & HS: There’s really no source. If that’s the actual truth, than we and the actors should be paid more money. I guess [studio executives] hide the truth so that they keep all that money.

So just how sick are you guys?!

JH & HS: We were really pleased that people responded to the first Harold & Kumar. We didn’t expect so many people pick up on a lot of the nuances. We tried to do the same in Harold & Kumar 2 so that people laugh and get that something extra.

We’re fortunate that we didn’t do well so quickly because we would have written a completely different story about going to Amsterdam and having a commentary about Americans overseas. That story isn’t fresh though. However, because this process happened over time we got to do something about post 9/11 paranoia, the attitudes of the government, things we’re embarrassed about the government. The truth is that we’re very patriotic Americans, but as George Bush says in the movie: “you don't have to believe in the government to be good Americans; you have to believe in this country and the people.”

The post 9/11 embarrassment of the flip of America becoming the warmongering villains was frustrating; that drove us to make the film as a commentary.

JH & HS: So we tried to make this as broad as possible: it’s a multicultural cast. It doesn’t focus on culture. It does have an anarchist tone of comedy. However, it’s not about focusing on young people or the formula of outrageous comedy concerning an edgy odd couple, etc. This film works on all types of people. We love to play on stereotypes; in fact, the stereotype is that this film is for young people.

You mean young people as in over 17 (rated R)?

JH & HS: We certainly expect the 12-14 year olds to watch the movies they can’t watch.

What about the ethnicity of the duo that makes this unique?

JH & HS: Thats the thing we enjoyed about these movies. It could’ve been a black or white guy. It’s just that we chose the Indian and Korean guy because really, they’re no different from any of us. Some of our best friends in high school and college are Indians and East Asian Americans, etc. So why don’t we put these people in our movie?

What about the antagonist of the film?

In his world, he’s the hero of the movie. He thinks he’s tracking down the villains, and he thinks his [racist] tactics are good.

Wouldn’t you think jokes like “cockmeat sandwich” and other aspects of the film would be offensive or damaging to a young person’s sense of homophobia?

JH & HS: We just focused on what would Harold & Kumar do in those situations.

What about the Roger Bart character who has this great moment and all of a sudden you kill him off?

JH & HS: In terms of Roger Bart, we just thought about what would be funny. We’re building up this guy to be this hero, and he does that. But just in the moment he has his moment and everything is resolved, he ends up dying. We’re not out to show everyone in government is bad. We wanted work in a style that if we have a serious poignant moment, we wanted to destroy it, like getting sucked out of a plane.

Why White Castle?

JH & HS: We wanted a burger chain in Jersey. But there's also the play on the name of these two guys going to “WHITE castle”. But that was like those smarter/double meaning elements in the script that comes by accident.

We also found that a lot of times in LA, there's soooo many burger chains and people would always wanted to go to this ONE burger chain and they would drive for 30 min past all those OTHER burger chains just to go to this one chain. So this movie also makes fun of American commercialization in that we need 20,000 versions of the same thing to be satisfied.

What was with that reference to the lovechild NPH had with the Whoopi Goldberg stand-in?

JH & HS: Whenever we write for NPH, we always think about what would be more disturbing for him? We treat him like an 11 year old child.

What happens when you two fight?

JH & HS: Never happens. We’re always really happy and appreciative of how lucky we are. We have disagreements, but we talk about it.

What’s next?

JH & HS: Not sure. We’re literally handing in a script the day Harold & Kumar 2 comes out. It’s about the way male friendship changes when a guy gets married. It’s actually a personal story of Thomas.

And with that they’re cut off and ushered into the next room. That’s a wrap! All the journalists and myself quickly clean up and left as quickly as we came in, grabbing a few complimentary cookies along the way. Thank you Regency Hotel!





Multicultural colors include:

  • Golden Beige
  • Beige
  • Tan
  • Tawny
  • Bronze
  • Terra Cotta
  • Mahogany
  • Sienna
Lesson plan booklet included to provide engaging lesson plans for the classroom and artroom.

We kid you not.

At long last, Calvin's interview with Harold and Kumar 2 actor Kal Penn (... with the help of some other very excited kids)! Read up, this comes to The Blaaag only once in a while. Excuse the looks on Mr. Penn's face, I'm sure he was dying for some of that delicious Fiji water right next to him (in the picture beneath the interview).

--

Kal Penn walks in smiling. The table bristles with excitement as the first question is asked.

So how did you feel about doing a sequel to the first Harold & Kumar film?

KP: I was surprised there was even a sequel. The first one didn’t do well in theaters or DVD marketing. However, I believe that the subsequent reaction over time gave New Line Cinemas enough money to do a sequel. Therefore, this sequel is dedicated to the fans who made this happen.

I thought the 200 million dollars was made from the first film?

KP (incredulous): Well if that’s the case, I haven’t seen that money! I wouldn’t be wearing the same clothes I’m wearing now. In fact (laughing), I would have to hire a lawyer because we definitely didn’t have that much money to put into the sequel.

Was the purpose to put the heroes into the minority?

KP: The purpose was to make an All-American buddy movie. It could be labeled as a teen film, a satire, or a stoner comedy. It may be all three or none of those things. That’s why the audience loves it: you see characters in situations you haven’t seen them in before, and it’s not because of their ethnicity, it’s because of the good writing.

Is there a little bit of reality in which the racist imagery in the film is grounded?

KP: Well it’s funny, because in one of the first scenes in the airport where Harold and I are waiting in line, I get pulled out because of I’m a “suspicious man of color.” It goes back to an actual story where the director and writer of Harold & Kumar, John Cho, and myself were waiting in line in Austin, Texas. So they go through, no beep. John [Cho] goes through, no beep. But when I went through without beeping, I of course still got pulled out of the line by TSA officials.

So they search me and pat me down and do all the security checkpoint stuff and let me go. Then one of the writers [for Harold & Kumar] came up to me and was like “I have something to tell you that might piss you off.” And then I was like, “I’m already pissed off. How can it get any worse?”

Well the thing was that prior to meeting us at the airport, he was coming back from a weekend camping trip and had a hunting knife on him that he forgot to take it out of his bag as he was checking into airport security. However, the TSA officials were so focused on me, as that “suspicious man of color,” that they didn’t even pay attention to the hunting knife.

So yeah, all ethnicities have gone through it before. This sequence helped with writing the opening scene, but in a light way that John & Hayden would write it.

Do you feel the burden of it being marketed as an Asian American film?

KP: I don’t think that is the appeal; I think the appeal is to a wider audience. I remember back in the day I wouldn’t see anyone like me except for Indiana Jones & Temple of Doom or Apu [from the Simpsons]. Now I think [Asian Americans] are of course going to get excited about seeing people looking like them. However, the movie is also cool in that it still appeals to all kinds of people who enjoy different appeals. Frat boys enjoy it, Asian Americans enjoy it, etc.

You see, both Harold & Kumar in the film went to Columbia (Calvin cheers, Kal stops to nod in approval), and they’re both smart. Just that one’s a banker, and one’s not sure about medical school. It’s not that one’s smart and one’s dumb or one’s clueless and one’s isn’t. Both are bright, it’s just different personalities. However, it’s weird that people call me Kumar in real life.

So you have two careers now?

KP: Yes. One’s serious and one’s comedic.

Does being Kumar prevent you getting parts like in The Namesake?

KP: Actually it helped because Mira Nair’s son is a big fan of Harold & Kumar. When I heard the casting call for “The Namesake” I begged the casting department for the role but I never got a reply back. Apparently Mira already had a short list of actos she wanted for the part of Golgol and I definitely wasn’t on it. However, thanks to my involvement in Harold & Kumar, every night and every morning Mira would hear to no end from her son who begged her constantly to “get Kumar in The Namesake.” So eventually she relented and I got the chance to audition and eventually work with a very smart writer & director.

What are you doing now?

KP: I’m working on a TV show called House. I play a regular called Lawrence Kutner who likes the unorthodox way of doing medical stuff.

Anyone you want to work with?

KP: Natalie Portman, Mira Nair, Spike Lee, Larry Clark.

Do you have to be more selective now as an actor?

KP: That’s the goal of the actor: To build up your resume to get the foot in the door. You think we’re doing well after Harold & Kumar, but on the inside it’s actually much tougher. For example, I’m getting older so I can’t do Harold & Kumar 14.

How old are you now? Can you still feel you can do more roles like Harold & Kumar?

KP I’m 30. I still act like I’m 11 though.

Do you feel a responsibility now to break stereotypes as a South Asian American actor?

KP: I don’t feel any responsibility to break stereotypes. I think there’s an acknowledgement you can do certain things in that capacity. But folks don’t realize that this really relies on the writers instead of the actors, which are jobs that the Asian American community doesn’t encourage their people to go into. It’s really good writing that creates those stereotype breaking roles, not good actors.

For sure though, playing fields are definitely getting more diverse nowadays, and Harold & Kumar contributes to that. I can certainly relate to the sense of empowerment.

Does this movie encourage drug use?

KP: No. I think anytime they do use drugs, they screw up, you know? If anything, what’s important about this film is that in any other country we’d get short or imprisoned for making fun of our prime minister, president, king, whoever. Here in this film we make fun of President George W. Bush in such a ridiculous way and that’s okay! And it’s not even an anti-Bush movie or anti-Drug, or an Asian American film. It’s a simple fun film about 2 guys on a journey.

Kal’s agent hounds us for asking too many questions as all of us rush to take pictures with him as he’s wrapping up the last question. To save time, Kal decides to take a group picture and encourages us all to facebook each other for the photo.


 

Copyright 2006| Blogger Templates by GeckoandFly modified and converted to Blogger Beta by Blogcrowds.
No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without prior written permission.